Why Global Warming is a Hoax-Part 1


Dr. Tim Ball, professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg: “The analogy I use is that my car is not running very well, so I ignore the engine, which is the Sun, and I’m going to ignore the transmission, which is water vapour, and I’m going to be looking at one nut on the right rear wheel, which is the human-produced CO2. The science is that bad. When people say you don’t believe in global warming, I say no, I believe in global warming, but I don’t believe that human CO2 is causing that warming. In the post-war years, when industry and the economies of the world really got going and human production of CO2 just soared, the global temperature was going down. In other words, the facts don’t fit the theory.”

I didn’t become curious until Al Gore refused to debate.

Like a lot of people in the 1990s I had no idea the earth was cooking and we were all in mortal danger from autos spewing their deadly poison, Co2, into the atmosphere. I learned about the Global Warming issue when most of us did, around the time An Inconvenient Truth premiered. Reading about the science I was struck how compelling it was, how utterly believable a premise that all the pollution sent skyward by Man’s burning of Fossil Fuels was creating a Greenhouse Effect that would slowly, then much more quickly, warm the planet to unsustainable levels. The Smart People all said that we were doomed if we didn’t take action quickly.

On March 21st, 2007 in front of Congress Al Gore proclaimed that “The Science is Settled” and that there was no debate required. Only action. Expensive action.

Since then, despite how incredibly complex this issue is,  Mr. Gore has refused any calls to debate his stance on Climate Change.

Screen Shot 2017-01-22 at 2.14.07 PM.png

If someone is confident in their arguments why would they refuse to debate them ? because they aren’t confident in their arguments.

Along the way Global Warming became “Climate Change” and an industry worth $1.5 trillion per year. This alone should make us wary.

GW Chalkboard.jpg

So lets cut through the fog. Here is an easy, logical way to understand why the “Climate Change” debate needs new direction:

  1. We are told, by governments and scientists across the globe, that the theory of Man-Made Global Warming is “Settled Science”.
  2. Anyone that believes in something called “Settled Science” admits they believe in Science.
  3. Science is governed by the Scientific Method where all hypothesies are tested until proven or disproven. Famous physicist Richard Feynman said “If it disagrees with Experiment, it’s wrong”
  4. The Hypothesis for Global Warming/Climate Change is “CO2, a by-product of the burning of fossil fuels, poured into the atmosphere will cause a greenhouse effect and warm the planet. Therefore we must stop Man’s use of Fossil Fuels to lower global CO2 levels” 
  5. Government satellite (Remote Sensing Systems or RSS) data confirms at least 21 years of nearly flatline global temperatures, at the same time of increased CO2  in the atmosphere. At this time the temperature trend appears to be towards cooling, not warming. Also, after the flatlining of global temperatures was publicized as proof that AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) was false there has been major controvery regarding tampering of the RSS datasets which reversed the temperature decline.
  6. Thus, the original hypothesis that the Earth is warming as a result of human-caused greenhouse gases has failed. And it keeps failing.
  7. Therefore, every program, tax or treaty based on this faulty hypothesis should be re-examined or abandoned.

Arno Arrak, author of the book What Warming? Satellite view of global climate change; he was a nuclear chemist on NASA’s Apollo programme: “In 2007 we got some serious cooling while climate models using carbon dioxide theory insisted on relentless warming at the same time. If a theory predicts warming and we get cooling that theory as a scientific theory has failed and must be abandoned.

I’m guessing your mind is SCREAMING at you right now….that’s called Cognitive Dissonance, it comes from the decades of Environmental Propaganda guised as “information” force fed to you by the Media. Remember the “Crying Indian” commercial in the 1970’s ? our society has been indocrinated by Environmentalists since the 1960s and that propaganda is bearing fruit now…generations of people blinded to the fact that there is an agenda behind all the Eco-Noise.

Let’s be clear, because this is how people get lost in this debate; Climate Changes, that’s what it does, to dispute that truth would be to say the sun rises in the West. What i’m disputing is the Political meaning of Climate Change, that there is irrefutable truth that CO2 raises the global temperature and that the world must band together to spend $trillions and give away essential freedoms to combat it.

If you can’t wrap your head around the “Global Warming Hypothesis/No Warming for 21 Years” truth please read it again, it is the only metric that matters.

Question: Knowing the Science isn’t Settled should society be asked to continue paying $Trillion$ to stop Climate Change ?

Fallacies that Big Science, the Media, Hollywood and Education tell the public:

  1. The Science is Settled on the hypothesis of Climate Change. Wrong, there is No Such Thing as Settled Science.
  2. That CO2 is a pollutant. Wrong: https://www.youtube.com/embed/BC1l4geSTP8
  3. That if we stop using Fossil Fuels we can control the Weather.
  4. That “97% of Climate Scientists agree on the Man-Made Climate Change hypothesis”

(MIT Climate Scientist) Richard Lindzen said in an interview on Howie Carr’s radio show: “To imply that a rise of temperature of a tenth of a degree is proof that the world is coming to an end — has to take one back to the dark ages.” He added, “As long as you can get people excited as to whether it’s a tenth of a degree warmer or cooler, then you don’t have to think, you can assume everyone who is listening to you is an idiot.”

“The whole point is so crazy because the temperature is always going up or down a little. What is astonishing is that in the last 20 years it hasn’t done much of anything,” Lindzen continued.

“What they don’t mention is there has been a big El Nino in 2016 and in recent months the temperature has been dropping back into a zero trend level,” he added.

In Part 2 i’ll break down why Global Warming is a Hoax.





Leave a Reply